Email this page to a friend!

MDG3: The Story of Kakenya

 

 

 As Kofi Annan identified back in 2008, there are 860 million illiterate adults in the world, and
two thirds of these are women. Out of more than 100 million children not currently in school,
the majority are girls.

MDG3 calls for the elimination of the gender disparity in education for women and girls at
all levels, by 2015. In this visually beautiful video, Kakenya tells her uplifting story and it
illustrates the great things that can be accomplished if we uphold our commitment to achieve
the third MDG.

Her story is a wonderful example of the far reaching effects of women’s empowerment in a
single community. It demonstrates that enabling a female child to go to school, and to get an
education equal to that of a male child, will positively change the lives of all members of her
community.

The story of Kakenya shows how this type of change, or cultural shift, in a community needs
to come from within the community itself, rather than from the outside. And, that change
begins with a conversation.

Providing an education for women and girls equips them with the confidence to speak out,
and to assert more control over their own lives. An education also creates a space in which
women and girls can speak freely, and in which they will be listened to with equal respect.
As Kakenya’s story show us, when given the opportunity to speak and act in an environment
equal to that of their male counterparts, women can, and do bring about incredible change.

Vital Voices is an organisation working across the world with people like Kakenya. They
empower women and girls to create spaces in which to lead and to assert their voices with
confidence, and to transform their communities.

Posted by Jessica Wild - GPP Intern in Women & Gender, Education for column Millennium Development Goals on Jul 6th 2010, 21:52

Comments

07/07/10 9:54am - Posted By Steven - Reply to this comment
This is inspiring.
21/07/10 9:36pm - Posted By David - Reply to this comment
Inspiring but also an indictment on the failure of the men and the government in her country to provide such a basic need. I wonder what would have happened if her father had not agreed to let her attend school. Would many fathers agree?
13/06/12 9:32pm - Posted By Auth - Reply to this comment
This report miserpresents the MDGs and takes a very Eurocentric view of the development enterprise. First, the report states that the MDGs are too narrowly defined. Yet, they represent a far more comprehensive agenda than the growth-driven doctrine that previously prevailed. Going further than this and aiming at a universal political blue print of how development should be managed would be a bridge too far. We live in a world of sovereign states and poor though they may be developing countries will undertandably resist the unabashed political conditionality that you are advocating. Second, the paper states that the MDGs confuse means and ends. This is absolutely not the case and ironically it is a main drawback of your own report. Conversely, a notable strength of the MDGs is that they emphatically stay away from specifying the means to achieve the goals and indicators it lays out to track development progress. achieved. Indeed, the Monterrey compact makes it abundantly clear that individual countries are in the driver seat of the poverty reduction agenda. This is the purpose of the Poverty Reduction Stragegy Process. While it studiously stays away from domestic politics, it stresses the need for a holistic development vision and lays out ownership, partnership and result orientation as fundamental principles of engagement. Third, the report does not address the legitimacy issue. The MDGs are grounded in the work of several UN conferences to which all countries of the world have participated. They were endorsed by all UN members at the highest level (except for Cuba) following intensive debate and negotiations that involved all major stakeholders. By contrast the fragility concepts that te report uses to buttress its narrative are not broadly accepted. Indeed, they are resented by countries thus categorized by the rich countries' club. Following the recent financial crisis it now appears that many OECD countries are exhibiting signs of fragility while emerging market economies that do not comply with the governance tenets proposed by International Alert have become the engine of the global economy. Nor is it accurate to state that India and China did not benefit from aid. For decades they were the largest World Bank Group borrowers and they have made shrewd use of the economic management advice proferred to them. Fourth, the report is grounded on intellectual premises that need revisiting in the wake of the unfolding financial crisis. The rules of the game of the global system more than the MDGs need revisiting in the common interest. The International Alert report does not address issues of trade, migration, foreign direct investment, environment that underlie the current global malaise and hamper development in the poorest regions of the world. Here again, the report fails to notice the value of the MDGs: MDG#8 does address (however tentatively) the need to level the playing field of the international economic system. Fifth, the hard reality is that achieving a shared understanding of what human progress looks like is a missionary and aspirational goal which can only be reached (if it can be reached at all at the global level) through public debate, broad based participation and shrewd international diplomacy.From this perspective, the template proposed by the report is polemical and it would be dead on arrival in the international diplomatic arena. Indeed, the Douglass North view you are promoting is not all that different from the end of history model proposed by Francis Fukuyama in the wake of the Soviet Union implosion. This big picture model of the world no longer fits. Indeed, Fukuyama has since clarified his position and his more recent state building doctrine is far more nuanced, agnostic and convincing. Paradoxically the liberal, pluralistic, civil society centred approach that you are advocating (and that I personally subscribe to) is precisely the model that the United Nations agencies (especially the UNDP) has quietly promoted alongside the MDGs. But it is now being shunned by many developing countries. This is not surprising: many western countries that comply with its tenets are teetering on the brink of financial ruin. By contrast, a number of development states (China, Vietnam, etc.) have broken many of its rules and yet (whether we in the west like it or not) have so far proven remarkably resilient to global economic downturns. Indeed, over the past decades they have experienced high growth rates, reduced poverty and accumulated vast reserves of foreign currency. A corollary of this unexpected outcome is that it is bringing back to the fore basic apolitical Washington consensus rules about sound economic management that the western states have ignored in the exuberance of their debt driven economic strategies and that developmental states able to connect to the global market and to achieve internal security have studiously observed with excellent results at the macroeconomic level. The unpalatable fact is that the authoritarian capitalist state model while unappetizing to western electorates has many adherents in the zones of turmoil and transition (witness Rwanda) for one simple reason: it offers stability and security for the bulk of the population. This is where big bang economic reform strategies pushed by the international financial institutions in post conflict states have lacked savvy. Fifth, given these trends, it is unhelpful for your paper to ignore the Human Development paradigm (and the Amartya Sen perspective that it embodies). This broad based development consensus is in fact not inconsistent with what you are suggesting and it is surprising that your paper does not examine it. Nor do you give credit to the efforts of the previous Secretary General to connect security and development through the Commission for Human Security and the In Larger Freedom report. It failed to secure broad based support but was nevertheless the right doctrine for the times and it is one that may yet prevail.
14/06/12 5:43pm - Posted By jcmarqtehc - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
yVU0yS <a href="http://gcjahnbcjlgu.com/">gcjahnbcjlgu</a>
15/06/12 12:13am - Posted By rwnetiyqur - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
ZJgQod , [url=http://opddudvluamd.com/]opddudvluamd[/url], [link=http://adfwpflofwap.com/]adfwpflofwap[/link], http://edsdblieevtw.com/
16/06/12 8:18am - Posted By yoaklnidps - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
zcRuKS <a href="http://abmgljoifssi.com/">abmgljoifssi</a>
16/06/12 1:26pm - Posted By dqgjggfsl - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
8mX3V7 , [url=http://uixrbsxeyqpf.com/]uixrbsxeyqpf[/url], [link=http://yxgwqhruvkdq.com/]yxgwqhruvkdq[/link], http://tzeanqusfxwm.com/
25/10/12 4:12am - Posted By Eli - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Batool Welfare Trust(BWT) is registered non-governmental origtisanaon working for diffrent social sector,including Education,Health,Environment,Human Rights,Youth Betterment,Women Empowerment etc.Therefore we, BWT want to send our youth delegates to attend the 8th Annual Youth Assembly at the UN MDG Executive Sessions for Young Professionals.We request you that please allow us to send youth professional for this valueable sessions to support UN MDGs.We hope you will consider our request and guide us for it RegardsNazia BatoolPresidentBatool Welfare Trust
25/10/12 8:48am - Posted By vvqvtog - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
k9bdnD <a href="http://dqpfjnqypsqo.com/">dqpfjnqypsqo</a>
26/10/12 3:30pm - Posted By uovjvawq - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
MINBSc , [url=http://nnhfslgaxauw.com/]nnhfslgaxauw[/url], [link=http://wajlsnnttpje.com/]wajlsnnttpje[/link], http://jahumhhojpuy.com/
27/10/12 4:44pm - Posted By wihulvrmrc - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
NIW32C , [url=http://mnswkmonrgar.com/]mnswkmonrgar[/url], [link=http://dhvyauyaalrt.com/]dhvyauyaalrt[/link], http://romyaeiaisnr.com/

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload