Email this page to a friend!

They Spend HOW Much? Changing U.S Aid Perceptions

 

How much would you guess the United States spends on foreign aid?

Go ahead! Take a guess.

If you guessed 25%, which is what the Washington Times reported most Americans thought to be spend on foreign aid in 2011, you would still believe that we spent less than a recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation. The survey, which was a random selection of 1,205 adults ages 18 and older across the United States, found that the average American believed that 27% of the budget was allotted for foreign aid spending in 2012.

The reality of aid spending in the United States is actually staggeringly less. The U.S government spends around 1% of the budget on aid, not including projects in Afghanistan and Iraq (this is included in defense spending). This is a far cry from commitments mad in 1970, and almost every major summit since.

In 1970, the world’s rich countries agreed to give 0.7% of their GNI (Gross National Income) as official international development aid, annually. Since that time, despite billions given each year, rich nations have rarely met their actual promised targets. The U.S. is often the largest donor in dollar terms, but ranks amongst the lowest in terms of meeting the stated 0.7% target. Furthermore, spending is still a fraction of the most recent commitment made in 2009 at the G8 in L'Aquila, which focused on lifting 50 million people out of hunger through farming programs.

It is easy to see why this misconception about aid spending may be prevalent in the United States. In a quick Google search with the term “aid pledges by the U.S.”, a slew of contradictory and confusing information emerges. A majority of the top ten search results are articles about emergency funding and disaster relief for countries like Libya, Somalia and the Sahel region. With the numbers that are bandied around, 100M here and 6M there, it appears that we’re cumulatively spending our share.  

To change this perception, more notice must be given to sustainable programs that are pulling people out of poverty with agricultural training and saving lives with healthcare for women and families.  Solutions must be highlighted that don’t revolve around sending bags of rice, that once eaten, leave local economies depressed and people without the skills to feed themselves.

There is hope, however, that attitudes regarding aid can change with the dissemination of correct information. For example, when survey respondents were told that only about one percent of the federal budget is spent on foreign aid, the number of respondents who believed too little is spent on aid more than double.  They even recognize the lack of media coverage. The Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that roughly half of Americans (52%) said the news media spends too little time covering global health issues, up from 41 percent in 2010.

Additionally, global health aid has the potential to be relatively popular, even if foreign aid is not. Fifty four percent of Americans say the government is spending too much on foreign aid, whereas only 21% say we are spending too much to improve health for people in developing countries. This means that people are more inclined to approve of foreign aid spending if there is a comprehendible purpose. Most Americans ranked basic needs such as clean water and reducing hunger, along with improving children’s health, as top priorities.

The study from the Kaiser Family Foundation provides us with a crucial lesson: that there is a massive opportunity to change American opinion of foreign aid spending through advocacy and education efforts.  The problem is not that Americans believe that the United States shouldn’t play a role in aiding global programs, rather there is a lack of understand about how much and where the money is going.

Drew Altman, Kaiser Family Foundation President and CEO, captured this perfectly in a column he wrote on the findings:

 "One of the strongest predictors of support was the belief that aid would make a difference. This means that documenting the impact of assistance and then communicating that to opinion leaders and the public is absolutely critical for advocates of foreign aid and global health."

Will you step to this challenge?

 

Posted by Danielle Goldschneider in What Can I Do? for column GPP - United States on May 26th 2012, 01:09

Comments

26/05/12 6:58pm - Posted By Graeme Codrington - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Danielle, this is a fascinating insight into perception and reality. But I am a bit confused. My understanding is that America does not meet it's stated commitment to spending 0.7% of GNI on aid. So, how much DO they spend? I understand that 1% of the government budget is not 1% of GNI, but your article doesn't give us that number. It would help if you could. Thanks.
12/06/12 12:23pm - Posted By Adul - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
I would like to thank you for the efforts you've put in wtinirg this website. I'm hoping the same high-grade website post from you in the upcoming as well. In fact your creative wtinirg abilities has inspired me to get my own website now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a great example of it.
13/06/12 4:52am - Posted By wzwrrall - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
IgUOxW <a href="http://okqpondsybtm.com/">okqpondsybtm</a>
14/06/12 3:44am - Posted By kjhgkpvwzul - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
fNIBrc , [url=http://pbignvsekoez.com/]pbignvsekoez[/url], [link=http://rpjdrtjjievf.com/]rpjdrtjjievf[/link], http://mahdhggalili.com/
14/06/12 5:15pm - Posted By irbxoh - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
m1NchT <a href="http://xuujayixeykh.com/">xuujayixeykh</a>
+ 16/07/12 6:36pm - Posted By Tiina - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Umm. Uh-oooh. I halfway lost this clghlenae today, because I already made plans to go shopping when I woke up this morning, because I've gained some weight. (I'm still working on the IChoose2move clghlenae). But I must say that in the past two years, since I have made a life change and moved to another state, I am more conscious of spending. I moved into a smaller place(no more walk through closet), and now I see how much I've been blessed and didn't even realize it. In my new place I had nowhere to put alot of my things, so I've attempted to cram them all into a closet and under the bed. For instance, I had a whole garbage bag full of purses,some with the tag still on them,that won't fit under the bed. (We won't talk about the shoes). I can only carry one purse at a time, so this has forced me to be a more giving person giving to others who could use.
18/09/12 2:02am - Posted By DC Matthews - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Tina,
Good of you to give !. So many have many un used things others would be happy to have one of.
There are many good orgs to give to. Not sure where you are but for giving to a good cause that is a hand up -places like this that help women get dressed for job interviews is nice. www.workingwardrobes.org/
16/07/12 10:32pm - Posted By dxabgaztm - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
lw9ak4 <a href="http://ebnliwowpccn.com/">ebnliwowpccn</a>
19/07/12 12:02am - Posted By gvyfkqxljji - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Ucy64F <a href="http://tfnsyhwdlzom.com/">tfnsyhwdlzom</a>
+ 23/07/12 12:25pm - Posted By Erih - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
Yo bro. Reform comes from above as a neat little pakcage you don't have to think about. Revolution comes from the bottom up and it requires thought (something which the bourgeoisie always lacks to the proletariat). By saying we are the 99%' we mean simply that the quotion of material wealth and human dignity is disproportionately and unjustly invested in the 1% in our society' (as you might imagine it). This is perhaps more true at this stage in history (advanced global capitalism, postmodernity- whatever you want to call it) as it has ever been. That is the point and it is actually quite coherent. If you ask, as all bourgeois interlocutors eventually do, but what do you expect me to do about it? I answer: pay more taxes a-hole.
23/12/12 3:37am - Posted By herbert hoover - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
you 99% are in my pocket and you will be there forever because you will buy the stylish clothes and nifty electronic gadgets, eat at the fancy cafe, drink the gourmet coffee, watch the latest movies and listen to the hippest music. you, the 99% are the consumers, and you have purchased yourselves into slavery.
23/07/12 10:40pm - Posted By skncgftz - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
NEr0hc <a href="http://lsttadvzloym.com/">lsttadvzloym</a>
24/07/12 12:18pm - Posted By pwvhun - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
T1sDDk , [url=http://qmoefrsujrkn.com/]qmoefrsujrkn[/url], [link=http://frwnzdgcxfvm.com/]frwnzdgcxfvm[/link], http://xblengiptpoz.com/
25/07/12 11:15pm - Posted By titalqonabo - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
3w9Ybl <a href="http://lnrqncsoutyy.com/">lnrqncsoutyy</a>
18/09/12 1:57am - Posted By DC Matthews - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
IF More than $3billion a year is going to Israel are they getting the lion's share of the foreign aide vs those who need it most?

Where do we find out who got what and if Israel's big chunk and other is maybe hidden in another budget(DOD?)
12/10/12 4:32pm - Posted By Mnedim - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
admin: Maybe I read materials too liarltely, which I thought was the primary purpose in reducing matters to writing so that no misunderstanding is possible. The mere fact that the owner has made application for permit to demolish the building speaks volumes to me. That your failed efforts to make contact with the owners also speaks volumes they don't have a desire to be engaged by members of the community in discussion about their private business affairs, such as that building. It seems to me that no interpretation whatsoever is required.I beg to differ with you about the Post Office. If the U.S. Postal Service desired to continue to operate a Post Office in Still Pond, it would find an alternative manner or site on which to do that. The simple fact of the matter is that being the monopoly it is, the Postal Service doesn't care what the community wants. It writes its P & L Statement every year with red ink, losing billions of dollars. I can think of no plausible reason why why an administrator would desire or agree to be criticized by the management of that organization for making a decision to continue an unprofitable Post Office in the village, when an opportunity presents itself to terminate that service and its expense. They would decline promptly. It is my opinion that since the Postal Service has done nothing to restore a Post Office in Still Pond, you can pretty much take it on faith that it isn't going to happen.
12/10/12 8:04pm - Posted By hulqxyjrlo - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
x7nshp <a href="http://pxzigydnussd.com/">pxzigydnussd</a>
27/02/13 11:49pm - Posted By Mike - Flag as inappropriate - Reply to this comment
How do you people say we only spend 1% of our budget on foreign aid when our government don't even do a budget. Senate hasn't passed a budget in years, neither has Obama. What budget are you talking about. I believe its hard to say only 1% of our budget when we don't have budget plans or a balanced budget. And a country borrowing money and increasing debt shouldn't be spending any money in any kind of aid to other countries, disaster, food, water, or supplying the likes of radical egypt with billions of dollars worth of weapons. You liberal idiots make it sound like we don't spend hardly any money in aid. Once u add in all the factors of what we spend aiding and building and developing other countries it gets higher than 1%. Always a way to word things to make it sound not to bad to get more people to support ur out of control spending. How can a man in debt help another man eat, backwards thinking like this is way we r in debt.

Add Comment

Your Name:

Your Email (Not Displayed):

Please enter the code in the image into the box

Code:


Can't read the image? Reload